Top Gear Agile Retrospective

Top Gear Retrospective
Team Discussing The Problems Found

Often when there are delivery pressures or fires to fight, the retrospectives can feel administrative and are often overlooked, which is a real problem as they are invaluable for continuous improvement.

Having a bit more time to focus on one team recently, I have been putting more effort into getting retrospectives right and it’s time that has really paid off. Not only are the team benefiting, but from a personal point of view they are rewarding and fun to facilitate. Before I consider adopting a theme or focus for the retrospective, I try and consider the following points:

  1. Are there any particular topics/issues that are present that the retrospective should focus on.
  2. Are the problems within the teams control to resolve and how to approach these.
  3. How can we get to the root cause and do it in a way which is fun and interactive for the team, so that they want to be there and to want improve together.
  4. Will any of the approaches taken be uncomfortable for any of the team members.

The third point is especially vital in my opinion. With retrospectives occurring at the end of each sprint, they can easily become repetitive and boring. Making them fun increases the level of engagement and can really go along way to using the session for the team to improve. With a mixed group, it’s not always easy to find ways which will work for the groups personality. I try and find themes where everyone will get involved without alienating anyone. This can be difficult to identify with new teams as there needs to be trust between the team members to relax and explore ideas and vulnerabilities.

That said, I thought I’d share my most recent retrospective here with the hope to share my experience and get your feedback.

Top Gear Theme – Agile Retrospective

A while back I used ‘The Cool Wall Retrospective’ taken from the popular series Top Gear, and enjoyed the format with the team. I thought I’d revisit it and incorporate the car theme a little more. To help set the scene I asked each team member to send me at least one photo of themselves driving a car or at least in a photo with themselves and a car. This would help me set the mood and have some fun.

Preparing The Room

Before the team entered the retrospective room, I had printed out all the photo’s I had collected along with some other photo’s such as ‘The Stig’ and other ‘Top Gear’ related images just to help set the mood. I divided the wall into the relevant sections and scattered everybody’s images around the room to create a theme. I put a couple of random car images in for good measure. I also pre-printed some voting cards for the Cool Wall section. When the team entered the room they were having fun looking at each others photo’s and discussing the stories behind them. This created a positive mood and relaxed the team ready to start the session.

I then gave an overview of the retrospective structure and stated the approximate time for each. This helped keep focus and pace and it was referred to throughout the session.

Reading Out The Retrospective ‘Prime Directive’

I usually have a couple of copies of the ‘Prime Directive’ spread around the room and try to get one person to read it aloud to the group every so often. I think this is a good way to balance the room and clearly identify the importance to respect one another and our team condition before tackling our problems. I also try and encourage participants to believe in this statement. In case you’re not familiar with it, here it is :

Regardless of what we discover, we understand and truly believe that everyone did the best job they could, given what they knew at the time, their skills and abilities, the resources available, and the situation at hand. – 

1. Check In – Setting The Scene (10 Mins)

I like having an abstracted scenario to get the team thinking and discussing themselves and the previous sprint. Abstracting this gets the brain geared up for some lateral thinking. Sometimes I show short video clips and ask the team how the clip relates to the previous sprint. However for this retrospective I decided to ask a few ‘Check In’ questions instead, to get them thinking.

The questions were :

  1. In one word describe the previous sprint ?
  2. In one word whats on your mind ?
  3. In one word what do you want from this retrospective?
  4. Right now what car best describes you and why ?

Each person then read out their answers to the rest of the team. There were some interesting answers to question 4, which also created a few laughs.

2. Top Gear Cool Wall – Gathering Data (20 Mins)

Now the scene was set, it was time to get into the Top Gear themed ‘cool wall’. I had pre-printed around 25 cards which contained a few words on each relating to points to discuss around tangible properties of the team (not external issues). The points listed included a selection of hard and soft skills for example:

  • TDD
  • Manual Testing
  • Communicating With Other Teams
  • Asking For Help
  • Swarming
  • BDD
  • Peer Reviewing

In case you’re not familiar with the ‘Cool Wall’ idea from the show, the following is a brief attempt at explaining the concept :

  1. There are 4 columns from left to right labelled on a wall:
    • Uncool
    • Cool
    • Super Cool
    • Sub-Zero
  2. The idea is that the better you are at something, the cooler it is and vice versa. Therefore on our 4 columns, you would be really good at something if it was within ‘Sub-Zero’.
  3. I selected a card from the pre-written pile and the team would vote using the cards provided to them.
  4. I then place the card in the column the team voted on. If there was a divide of opinion within the team, we would have a quick debate and then re-vote.
  5. After completing the cards I asked the team if they wanted to write any cards and get to the team to vote.

After all the cards were placed on the wall it visually presents a picture what the team feel they are strongest at and which areas may need some work. This was a fun way to generate insights and really engaged the participants.

3. Finding the root cause through the 5 Whys technique – Generate Insights (20 mins)

With the data gathered identified on the ‘Cool Wall’, we now had to get under the bonnet and see what the problems were. To do this we carried out the following :

  1. Everybody had 2 stickers to place on the cards which they feel are most important to improve. This highlighted the top 6 issues to discuss.
  2. We then split into 2 teams of 3 and then each team selected one of the 6 cards in turn until each team had 3 cards each.
  3. I briefed the team on the 5 Whys technique and then asked then to carry this out on each of the cards until they feel they found the root cause.
  4. After both teams had completed their analysis of each card or if the time expired, they then explained their findings to the other team.

4. Circles And Soup – Decide What To Do (10-25 Mins)

Goal: Improve Your Past Project

This game, introduced by Diana Larsen, is used to efficiently form high-quality plans through retrospective analysis by recognizing factors that are within the team’s control. During retrospective activities, it is easy to hit a wall of unproductive blame. The moment the group reaches this barrier, “someone shoulds” and “if only you coulds” bounce around the room, knocking out any practical ideas for future advancement. Before determining what you can improve, you must first be clear on the dimensions you are able to regulate and what you need to adapt to. By identifying factors your team can control, influence, or cannot change, you can collectively discover how to respond to and overcome various situations.

The Game

Play instantly online!

In a white space (a poster, whiteboard, etc.), draw three concentric circles, leaving enough room between each one to place sticky notes or 3×5 notecards. Each circle represents a different element:

  • Inner circle: “Team Controls” – what your team can directly manage
  • Middle circle: “Team Influences” –persuasive actions that your team can take to move ahead
  • Outer circle: “The Soup” – elements that cannot be changed. This term — explained further by James Shore – refers to the environment we work in and must adapt to. Ideas from the other 2 circles can identify ways to respond to the barriers floating in our “soup.”

Ask your players to write their ideas for each circle on sticky notes. Once finished, ask them to post their notes into the respective circles. As a group, collaborate to identify how each idea can be used to improve your project. Encourage team members to expand on their ideas in order to further develop potential plans.

A neutral facilitator is recommended to keep the activity from becoming too emotional. Evaluating negative aspects of your project is a sensitive but necessary exercise, and can leave people feeling upset or hopeless. Avoid any discussions about blaming people or wishing something would happen. This frame of mind places the control out of the team’s hands: both halting all forward motion and creating a negative environment. Keep the atmosphere fun and enjoyable so people will feel comfortable sharing their ideas.

Why it Works

Negative self-evaluating activities often end up emotional and unproductive. Take advantage of this game’s visual organization and extensive collaboration to avoid the blame and hopelessness that cover-up ideas for future improvement. By identifying factors your team can control, influence, or cannot change, you can collectively discover how to respond to and overcome various situations. Play Circles and Soup to determine what you can do to avoid barriers and gain insight on what actions will most effectively enhance your project.

After successfully identifying actions that were in the teams control or where an action can influence other, the team then spot voted. The top 3 actions were then extracted and moved into the next sprint with everyones agreement.

5. Feedback – Conclusion (5-10 mins)

When the team were happy with their committed actions, we summarised the session and answered any further questions.

Before leaving the room I then asked the team to rate the retrospective anonymously, keeping in mind the following points :

  1. Was the session constructive and engaging ?
  2. Did the team get value out of the session ?
  3. Have we identified actions we can tackle to improve the team ?

I personally use this feedback to gauge what worked and what didn’t which is helpful to know what to improve on moving forward.

Overall I found this session to be rewarding and valuable to the team. It was fun, the energy level was high and most of all we identified ways to improve as a team with tangible actions to work with. If you would like to feedback ideas on the above or ask questions about the session, please feel free to comment below.








Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.